Off-duty police officers, hired by a small group of 
wealthy Biltmore residents, have apparently stopped harassing cyclists and 
others. As I reported a few weeks ago in an email sent out to 
email list subscribers of the Arizona Road Cyclist News newsletter (www.azroadcyclist.com), and posted on this blog (see below) at least one police officer had been stopping cyclists, 
walkers, and runners on the streets of the Phoenix Biltmore and implying that 
they were trespassing if they were not in the company of a Biltmore resident. 
Worse yet, some of the people who were stopped and questioned were ordinary Biltmore 
residents who were harassed for engaging in such suspicious activity as walking the dog in 
their own neighborhood. 
The implication that the people stopped and questioned 
for walking, jogging or cycling on the streets of the Biltmore 
were trespassing was false. I have checked with various sources, and although it 
is true that the streets in the Biltmore are private, outsiders have 
permission to use those private streets for recreational purposes.
I had heard stories of walkers being intercepted by 
police officers on the streets of the Biltmore, but I was not aware of the 
extent of the harassment 
until I found myself in a group of riders from the Arizona Bicycle Club (ABC) 
that was pulled over by officer Benjamin Carro of the Mountain View (formerly 
Squaw Peak) Phoenix Police precinct. 
Officer Carro stood in front of the group and delivered a 
long harangue in which he implied, although he did not directly state, that we 
were trespassing. He said that he was not "going to take names this time" or 
write us tickets, implying that he could legitimately do so. He pointed to one of the cyclists in the group and said that he had 
stopped him before. "I never forget a face." The implication was that the 
cyclist had not learned his lesson the first time he was stopped for being in 
the Biltmore, and here he was back again!
Two members of the cycling group promptly identified themselves 
as Biltmore residents. If Officer Carro had been using common sense, he would 
have stopped there rather than anger some of the Biltmore residents he was 
claiming to protect, but 
he wasn't. He continued to harangue us in disconnected sentences in a loud and 
authoritative voice, thereby harassing two of the people he was claiming to 
protect. 
When one of the cyclists started to ride off, Officer Carro stopped him, yelling that he did not have permission to leave yet.
When Officer Carro finally permitted our group to leave, 
cyclist Paul Klusman and I stayed behind to ask for the officer's name and badge 
number. We had independently decided to file a complaint. Officer Carro wrote 
down the information and gave it to Paul, who then rode off. I was left alone 
with the officer who once again began to harangue me, presumably with the 
intention of intimidating me into leaving without the information, but I 
interrupted him, stated that I had done nothing wrong, and politely reminded him 
that I wanted his name and badge number, at which point he stopped his harangue, 
wrote down the information, and handed it to me with seeming reluctance.
Our group was not the only one that Officer Carro stopped. 
Reader Dave McMeechan wrote that he was with a different ABC group that the 
officer stopped [see the "Feedback" section below]. I also have reports of 
joggers and walkers being stopped, although in those cases, the officer involved 
was not identified. I do not know if several police officers have been hassling  
people cycling, walking, and jogging in the Biltmore, or if Officer Carro is the only culprit. 
Paul telephoned Commander Gardner to set up a meeting who 
declined to meet with us and referred Paul to Officer Carro's supervisor, Sergeant Amy Breitzman, who wanted to resolve the 
matter over the phone. Paul insisted on a meeting.
At the meeting, Paul, 
Biltmore resident and cyclist Lou Morgan, Sergeant Breitzman, and I were joined by Sergeant 
Lynn Butcher of the precinct's Community Relations Bureau. I was permitted to attend only on condition that I not write about anything discussed 
at the meeting with one exception: I was 
given permission to write that cyclists may ride through 
the Biltmore under the condition that they stay to the right and ride no more 
than two abreast. I don't think I'm violating my promise by adding that 
I inquired several times why Officer Carro tried to make us believe that 
we did not have that permission when it wasn't true, but I 
couldn't get a straight answer to that question.
The Biltmore complex is not monolithic. It is controlled 
by several organizations including the Arizona Biltmore Hotel 
and various home owners' associations. Most of those organizations have no 
connection with and no influence over the off-duty police officers who patrol 
the Biltmore.
As mentioned earlier, a small group of (presumably wealthy) residents pays for the 
the patrols, allegedly because of a rash of 
break-ins, although in my checks of online crime statistics, I found no evidence 
of such break-ins. If the crime statistics available on the Internet are 
accurate, the Biltmore complex seems to be one of the safest places in the world 
to live, and the situation seems to be driven by paranoia.
The Arizona Biltmore Hotel, which 
maintains the Arizona Canal path and the Thunderbird Trail, as the street from the 24th Street entrance to the 
hotel is called, "welcomes cyclists, walker & 
joggers on its property" according to Becky Blane, the Hotel's public relations 
and marketing manager. Biltmore resident Scott Schirmer, who is one of the 
residents who hired the police officers to patrol the area, reluctantly admitted 
to me during a phone conversation that cyclists do indeed have permission to ride through the Biltmore, 
although he gave me the impression that he would take away that permission if he had 
the ability to do so.
Since Paul Klusman, Lou Morgan, and I had our meeting 
at the Mountain View precinct, I have had no more reports of cyclists, runners, 
and walkers being harassed by the police within the Biltmore. I ride thorough 
the Biltmore several times a week, and although I see a police car about half 
the time, I have not been stopped. If any readers have been stopped in the past 
several weeks, I would be grateful for the details.
In my view, 
the Mountain View Precinct and its commander Glen Gardner should admit the 
mistake and publicly apologize for the fact that at least one of its police 
officers was harassing citizens who were legitimately present within the 
Biltmore complex. By not openly acknowledging and apologizing for the unwise 
conduct, the 
Precinct and its commander give the impression that they are indifferent to the 
concerns of the public. Should Commander Gardner chose to make a public, written 
apology, I would not only be more than happy to publish it, I would applaud his 
good judgement.
 
